Archive for October, 2008

Enterprise 2.0 means cultural change

Mike Chapman on the Squared Root blog has written a interesting post on Brand Awareness and “large” enterprise 2.0.  In it he quotes Susan Scrupski on the topic of enterprise 2.0 adoption in large enterprises:

“we find that social, emergent behavior can be viewed as dissent in large enterprises. In the enterprise space, we find the major barrier to adoption of 2.0 ideologies is culture. Even if there is a groundswell of support to embrace social media, corporate cultures can run counter to its actual widespread acceptance. Marketers in large companies are more inclined to recognize the benefits of building relationships via social media sooner, but they run into roadblocks from other, more conservative, areas of the business. It’s a huge challenge for some large brands.”

I’ve been an evangelist for opening up product documentation using wikis, inside IBM, so that any IBMer could modify/improve/correct the content as they see fit.  And in the process, self identify on our intranet as a subject matter expert.  It was a radical idea when I first proposed it 30 months ago, and its been a great experience leading the effort to launch it on the IBM intranet.  There certainly was (and still is) a lot of status quo bias against trying something based on the principle of crowdsourcing inside such a large and traditionally hierarchical enterprise.  No surprise there.  But at the same time, there have been many IBMers who have been very supportive.

Based on my experience so far, Susan’s observation above is perfectly correct.  When it comes to enterprise 2.0 transformation in larger enterprises, its all about cultureI think only once you have a business culture that values (and measures!) transparent knowledge sharing amongst fellow employees will 2.0 things like I propose above start to achieve critical mass in larger enterprises.  And – those who share the most will become new centers of power and influence.

Mike also has a lot to say about my recent IBM Gets It presentation to the Austin Social Media Club.  By the end of my talk that evening it seemed like I had gotten all of the social media maniacs in the room rooting for IBM.  The comments were sure nice.  But actually, in a deeper sense, I think they were rooting for social media to take over the IBM enterprise, and I was just there to show them that yes there are evangelists working very hard on the inside trying to do just that.

Why would they root for IBM?   Well if the mother of all computer technology brands becomes a 2.0′ey social media driven enterprise, then they will all feel a terrific sense of validation.  And here I’m touching on something that I think is really cool about working for IBM.  During the presentation it became obvious to me that the technorati in the room were (1) surprised by the amount of activity and innovation around social computing technologies that is happening inside IBM, and (2) they want IBM to succeed with social media in a big way.  Ok – re. point (2), I was preaching to the choir.  But, my point goes deeper than that.  To illustrate, have a look at this fantastic community zen poster:  “The Web is Agreement“.  If you download the hi res PDF and have a close look you’ll see that across the entire technical landscape in the illustration you don’t find any mention of “IBM”, relative to the moral compass.  But IBM is playing a very active role in just about every part of this landscape (w/exception of the “Industry of Malware” thank goodness), and leading in some parts. Yet IBM doesn’t warrant a sign post on the map like Google or Microsoft.  That fact gives me a nice warm fuzzy feeling about the IBM brand – how IBM is able to be a huge player yet stay above the fray.

So in a sense, IBM isn’t just another player.  IBM helps define the playing field too.  How IBM succeeds with social media will define success patterns that other large enterprises will then follow.

CurrentCost adventure begins

I hate to look at our power bill every month.  And I want to help save the planet.  So I love the idea of having a home power consumption monitoring system that provides a real-time indication of how much energy you are consuming, and how much it is costing you.

There are many options out there now for devices like this.  I recently discovered that some of my IBMer colleagues in the UK are having a great time hacking on the CurrentCost device.  So I decided to give that one a go, knowing full well that I might have some integration problems hooking it into my house here in the US since the device is designed for UK households.  The fact that there is significant community activity focused hacking/extending the device’s output very is important to me.

I sent a note to CurrentCost inquiring about how to purchase and ship to a US consumer.  I received this response…

Hi Chris,

You may or may not be aware we have a very keen IBM community here in the UK, it may be due to that you have made contact?

Ordinarily we don’t ship overseas – the product, although adaptable is designed for the UK market. However, we like to support the IBM community and if you’d like to receive a unit, we would happily welcome your feedback for (possibly) altering it for your region.

If you would like to receive a unit with my compliments, please let me have a delivery address.

Kind regards

Martin Dix

Fantastic!

Yesterday the device arrived via FedEx.  Thank you for including the custom data access cable!

CurrentCost device OOB

CurrentCost device OOB

Now – I’m pretty sure that household current in UK is single phase 220v all the way to the wall sockets?  My house is standard US setup around here:  two phase 220V coming in, split into two single phase 110V hot buses in the power distribution box, with some circuits connecting across both buses to bring two phase 220 V to large appliances.

Question:  by placing the single induction coil sensor around only one of the two mains (thick black wires feeding into the top of the breakers below) will it be able to accurately sense the power being drawn by all of the loads in the house?

I’m thinking the answer on that is no.  I’m guessing it will sense the current coming on only one of the 110V buses plus the current from any 220V loads across both buses… effectively missing all of the 110V loads on the bus connected to the other main that it is not clamped to.  (I’m hoping I’m wrong?)


Twitter Updates

Pages

 

October 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031